logically rule out various possibilities until only a single possibility remainsconclusion is claimed to depend largely or entirely on some mathematical calculation or measurement.conclusion is presented as being "true by definition" that is, following simply by definition from some key word or phrase used in the argumentstatement that attributes some characteristic to all or most members of a given classargument in which a generalization is claimed to be probably true based on information about some members of a particular class.statement about what may or will happen in the future.asserts a claim and then supports that claim by citing some presumed authority or witness who has said that the claim is true.asserts or denies that something is the cause of something elserests on statistical evidence-that is, evidence that some percentage of some group or class has some particular characteristic.comparison of two or more things that are claimed to be alike in some relevant respectthe conclusion is claimed to depend on an analogy between two or more things.argument in which is is impossible for all the premises to be true and the conclusion false.conclusion does not follow necessarily from the premisesdeductive arguments that are both valid and have all true premisesdeductive arguments that either are invalid or have at least one false premiseconclusion does not follow probably from the premisesargument that is both inductively strong with all true premisesinductive argument either is weak or has at least one false premiseits meaning is fuzzy or inexact. Holt Environmental Science 6 The Organization of Life Name Class Date Critical Thinking continued REFINING CONCEPTS The statements below challenge you to refine your understanding of concepts covered in the chapter. Critical thinking is thinking that questions itself. Oh no! to state the conventional, dictionary meaningintended to make a vague word more precise so that the words meaning not left to the interpretation of the reader or listener.simply pointing to, or demonstrating, the thing being defined.provide specific examples of what the word refers toassigns a meaning to a word by listing subclasses of the general class to which the word referstells what part of speech a word is, how it is commonly pronounced, and whence is came.assigns a meaning to a word by identifying a general class(genus) to which things named by the word belong and then specifying a differentiating quality(difference)the images and feelings that are associated with the wordmild, comforting, or evasive words that take the place of harsh, blunt, or taboo words.are mistakes in reasoning that occur because premises are logically irrelevant to the conclusions.mistakes in reasoning that occur because the premises, though logically relevant to the conclusion, fail to provide sufficient evidence to support the conclusion.statement that counts in favor of another statementwe reject someones argument or claim by attacking the person rather than the persons argument or claimerror of criticizing a persons motivation for offering a particular argument or claim, rather than examining the worth of the argument of claim itself.arguer rejects anothers argument or claim because that persons fails to practice what he preaches.arguer attempts to justify a wrongful act by claiming that some other act is just as bad or worsecommitted when an arguer threaten harm to a reader or listen if he or she not accept the arguers conclusion and this threat is irrelevant to the truth of the arguers conclusion.occurs when an arguer inappropriately attempts to evoke feelings of pity or compassion from his listeners or readers.one that plays on a persons desire to be popular, accepted, or valued, rather than appealing to logically relevant reasons or evidence.committed when an arguer distorts an opponents argument or claim to make it easier to attackan arguer tries to sidetrack his audience by raising an irrelevant issues and then claims that the original issues has effectively been settled by the irrelevant diversion.committed when a key word is used in two or more senses in the same argument and the apparent success of the argent depends on the shift in meaning.an arguer states or assumes as a premise the very thing he or she is trying to prove as a conclusionan arguer cites a witness or authority who, there is good reason to believe, is unreliable.an arguer asserts that a claim must be true because no one has proven it false or, conversely, thaet a claim must be false because no one has proven it to be true.fallacy occurs when an arguer asks a question that contains an unfair or unwarranted presuppositionsan arguer claims, without sufficient evidence, that one thing is the cause of something elsewhen we draw a general conclusion from a sample that is biased or too smallwhen we claim, without sufficient evidence, that a seemingly harmless action, if taken, will lead to a disastrous outcome.occurs when an arguer compares two (or more) things that aren't really comparable in relevant respects.occurs when an arguer asserts inconsistent or contradictionary claims Critical thinking and reasoning a students introduction Learn with flashcards, games, and more — for free. Quizlet Thinking Chapter 6 Critical.
D) The failure to take into account context and relationships can lead to faulty decisions that we may later regret Critical thinking involves recognizing that an issue exists, analyzing information about the issue, evaluating information, and making conclusions. Sally held the door open for me when I was leaving classA) Requires that we raise our level of thinking and critically examine our interpretations of an experience, as well as those of others.Drag the terms to the appropriate spot of the pyramid1.
To ensure the best experience, please update your browser.Critical thinking and reasoning a students introductionwide range of cognitive skills and intellectual dispositions needed to effectively identify, analyze, and evaluate arguments and truth claimsthe tendency to see reality as centered on oneself.